Selasa, 23 Februari 2010

Lists growing...

Do you ever feel overwhelmed at your to do lists?

Sometimes I have multiple lists with so many sub categories... It feels like I'll never get anywhere. Lists that have to do with every aspect of my life...

I've got daily lists, Riley lists, Chloe lists, studio lists, house lists, Marsha lists (like don't forget to shower - seriously - and things like, shave today or it will be another week until you have enough shower time to fit it in), long term lists for house and garden, and so much more...

Recently (say since right after having Riley) some things have been able to come off my "life" list.

My putting off weight loss, eating heart healthier and exercising daily has ended. I'm getting better at trying to do these things. I want to feel healthier so I can do more with and for my little family unit (that does include me in there - I'm doing it for me too).

And with my cholesterol being high, now is the perfect time for me to get going with a healthier lifestyle... People do it every day, so why can't I? I can be one of "those" people can't I? And still endulge once and a while (and not every day like I have been)...



So no more stuff like this peanut butter with confectioners sugar & cream cheese flitch (Dave's Italian grandma used to make this - hence the 60lbs I've put on since dating, then marrying him)...

We'll see how this goes... Wish me luck! And good luck to those of you on a similar journey!!!

- Posted using BlogPress from my iPhone

Lists growing...

Do you ever feel overwhelmed at your to do lists?

Sometimes I have multiple lists with so many sub categories... It feels like I'll never get anywhere. Lists that have to do with every aspect of my life...

I've got daily lists, Riley lists, Chloe lists, studio lists, house lists, Marsha lists (like don't forget to shower - seriously - and things like, shave today or it will be another week until you have enough shower time to fit it in), long term lists for house and garden, and so much more...

Recently (say since right after having Riley) some things have been able to come off my "life" list.

My putting off weight loss, eating heart healthier and exercising daily has ended. I'm getting better at trying to do these things. I want to feel healthier so I can do more with and for my little family unit (that does include me in there - I'm doing it for me too).

And with my cholesterol being high, now is the perfect time for me to get going with a healthier lifestyle... People do it every day, so why can't I? I can be one of "those" people can't I? And still endulge once and a while (and not every day like I have been)...



So no more stuff like this peanut butter with confectioners sugar & cream cheese flitch (Dave's Italian grandma used to make this - hence the 60lbs I've put on since dating, then marrying him)...

We'll see how this goes... Wish me luck! And good luck to those of you on a similar journey!!!

- Posted using BlogPress from my iPhone

Senin, 22 Februari 2010

Will the Buzz drown the Tweets??

Since the time it launched few weeks back, Google Buzz has been just doing that. Creating Buzz… While the critics are mentioning about the privacy issues (Facebook too had faced privacy issues about a year back), many have started experimenting with this new platform…

For Google, it was necessary that they integrate the Buzz with their ‘star performer’ – Gmail (search engine being the sacred cow they cannot fiddle with). Google has been dabbling in the social media space for past many years, but somehow the success has been elusive. Their strike rate in social media is close to zero. While Orkut is popular in Brazil and India… but in markets that matters, they hardly have been able to make a dent. Flickr has far more traction amongst the online users that Picasa…and Google Wave just managed to create a ripple.

Twitter, since it hit the market in 2006, has been gaining popularity worldwide. The reasons for the same can be attributed to the following:
- Simplicity: Most people are normal… nobody wants to complex things, including technology innovations
- Tweet alerts through SMS
- Rapidly growing 3rd party application using twitter platform (APIs)


For twitter to reach the tipping point it took almost one year.. Wikipedia mentions, that it was during the SXSW festival that the twitter users (tweeps, as they are called now) increased drastically… For Google Buzz launch, they had the advantage of huge base of the millions of Gmail users – ready audience to try and experience the product…

Predictably there is the initial huge traffic onto the Buzz platform...The image below shows the traffic results on both these sites (Buzz and Twitter) – with visitors Buzz and twitter website almost on par (considering that twitter has many visitors coming from mobile platforms too)




However, the below chart shows the initial reaction of people using Google Buzz… as expected, there would be a lot of people who are there out of curiosity… and many more critical to this new platform, for they find comfort in what they are experiencing now. Going by this chart the earlier chart would be very different in a month’s time.



Buzz might not be able to drown the Tweets and the reasons for the same are:
- Buzz is currently an appendage in your gmail Inbox….
- Most people use/open email inbox only infrequently (even the regulars use it only once or twice a day and that too for a few minutes)
- Buzz does not have the exclusivity factor; something that twitter had when it was launched. Even Gmail had an exclusivity factor when it was launched
- Since Buzz is part of Gmail…. 3rd party applications using Buzz would be far and few
- Last if not the least….twitter is ‘cool’

What are your thoughts? I’d like to hear from you

Cheers

Santosh

Will the Buzz drown the Tweets??

Since the time it launched few weeks back, Google Buzz has been just doing that. Creating Buzz… While the critics are mentioning about the privacy issues (Facebook too had faced privacy issues about a year back), many have started experimenting with this new platform…

For Google, it was necessary that they integrate the Buzz with their ‘star performer’ – Gmail (search engine being the sacred cow they cannot fiddle with). Google has been dabbling in the social media space for past many years, but somehow the success has been elusive. Their strike rate in social media is close to zero. While Orkut is popular in Brazil and India… but in markets that matters, they hardly have been able to make a dent. Flickr has far more traction amongst the online users that Picasa…and Google Wave just managed to create a ripple.

Twitter, since it hit the market in 2006, has been gaining popularity worldwide. The reasons for the same can be attributed to the following:
- Simplicity: Most people are normal… nobody wants to complex things, including technology innovations
- Tweet alerts through SMS
- Rapidly growing 3rd party application using twitter platform (APIs)


For twitter to reach the tipping point it took almost one year.. Wikipedia mentions, that it was during the SXSW festival that the twitter users (tweeps, as they are called now) increased drastically… For Google Buzz launch, they had the advantage of huge base of the millions of Gmail users – ready audience to try and experience the product…

Predictably there is the initial huge traffic onto the Buzz platform...The image below shows the traffic results on both these sites (Buzz and Twitter) – with visitors Buzz and twitter website almost on par (considering that twitter has many visitors coming from mobile platforms too)




However, the below chart shows the initial reaction of people using Google Buzz… as expected, there would be a lot of people who are there out of curiosity… and many more critical to this new platform, for they find comfort in what they are experiencing now. Going by this chart the earlier chart would be very different in a month’s time.



Buzz might not be able to drown the Tweets and the reasons for the same are:
- Buzz is currently an appendage in your gmail Inbox….
- Most people use/open email inbox only infrequently (even the regulars use it only once or twice a day and that too for a few minutes)
- Buzz does not have the exclusivity factor; something that twitter had when it was launched. Even Gmail had an exclusivity factor when it was launched
- Since Buzz is part of Gmail…. 3rd party applications using Buzz would be far and few
- Last if not the least….twitter is ‘cool’

What are your thoughts? I’d like to hear from you

Cheers

Santosh

Will the Buzz drown the Tweets??

Since the time it launched few weeks back, Google Buzz has been just doing that. Creating Buzz… While the critics are mentioning about the privacy issues (Facebook too had faced privacy issues about a year back), many have started experimenting with this new platform…

For Google, it was necessary that they integrate the Buzz with their ‘star performer’ – Gmail (search engine being the sacred cow they cannot fiddle with). Google has been dabbling in the social media space for past many years, but somehow the success has been elusive. Their strike rate in social media is close to zero. While Orkut is popular in Brazil and India… but in markets that matters, they hardly have been able to make a dent. Flickr has far more traction amongst the online users that Picasa…and Google Wave just managed to create a ripple.

Twitter, since it hit the market in 2006, has been gaining popularity worldwide. The reasons for the same can be attributed to the following:
- Simplicity: Most people are normal… nobody wants to complex things, including technology innovations
- Tweet alerts through SMS
- Rapidly growing 3rd party application using twitter platform (APIs)


For twitter to reach the tipping point it took almost one year.. Wikipedia mentions, that it was during the SXSW festival that the twitter users (tweeps, as they are called now) increased drastically… For Google Buzz launch, they had the advantage of huge base of the millions of Gmail users – ready audience to try and experience the product…

Predictably there is the initial huge traffic onto the Buzz platform...The image below shows the traffic results on both these sites (Buzz and Twitter) – with visitors Buzz and twitter website almost on par (considering that twitter has many visitors coming from mobile platforms too)




However, the below chart shows the initial reaction of people using Google Buzz… as expected, there would be a lot of people who are there out of curiosity… and many more critical to this new platform, for they find comfort in what they are experiencing now. Going by this chart the earlier chart would be very different in a month’s time.



Buzz might not be able to drown the Tweets and the reasons for the same are:
- Buzz is currently an appendage in your gmail Inbox….
- Most people use/open email inbox only infrequently (even the regulars use it only once or twice a day and that too for a few minutes)
- Buzz does not have the exclusivity factor; something that twitter had when it was launched. Even Gmail had an exclusivity factor when it was launched
- Since Buzz is part of Gmail…. 3rd party applications using Buzz would be far and few
- Last if not the least….twitter is ‘cool’

What are your thoughts? I’d like to hear from you

Cheers

Santosh

Minggu, 21 Februari 2010

Twitter: Connection Generator or Content Generator

I’m sure the following scenarios would be familiar to most people… If you look carefully at what is being said or written in the Media (Television / Newspapers)… news on “My Name is Khan” – the movie, about Shah Rukh Khan’s comments and many other related titbits. Few months back it was Sashi Tharoor and about what he said (the cattle class comments), and what he was saying thereof. Another regular feature in the news channels happens to be what the latest tweets are on specific topics or current events… suddenly you see that Twitter is also about content…

The idea of Twitter was to provide a simple platform for the online users to update their status; and for their friends and followers to see and respond. The idea of keeping it under 140 characters was to make the integration with existing SMS platforms easier…. The idea has been very successful, and people have started taking on to Twitter a big way… The stats say that almost 40-45% of Twitter traffic is from Mobile platforms and the remaining from the web. The whole idea of Twitter was on ease of connecting and getting connected…. I’m sure using Twitter for content creation would have been last thing in the minds of the creators of Twitter.

The media (new or traditional) survives on content. The fresher and exclusive the content the better it is. Traditionally, media companies’ generated content mostly from internal sources (Editors, journalists, reporters etc); External (Freelancers, writers,) and Syndicated content (AP, Reuters, Bloomberg, PTI, etc)… and there was a cost attached to these sources of content. With the advent of the web and specifically the web 2.0, a free source of content was discovered – User Generated Content. And when the user is a celebrity, with some media sell-able value attached…the content becomes golden; Imagine if a newspaper or TV carries free content sourced from tweets, they could easily fill up columns or minutes of prime-time news…which otherwise they would need to have filled with paid content….

The way things are shaping up – Twitter would soon become a content generator for media companies and might even be supplying most of the content… Maybe, just maybe – some sort of content syndication (or content generator) could the elusive business model that Twitter can look forward to make money ;)

It is a marriage of convenience. Content starved media feeds of the tweets; and in return Twitter gets free publicity…which would translate into more people joining the twitter platform, and more tweets being generated…thus more content being published for the media to consume…

This looks like a story that will ‘live happily ever after’ :)

Twitter: Connection Generator or Content Generator

I’m sure the following scenarios would be familiar to most people… If you look carefully at what is being said or written in the Media (Television / Newspapers)… news on “My Name is Khan” – the movie, about Shah Rukh Khan’s comments and many other related titbits. Few months back it was Sashi Tharoor and about what he said (the cattle class comments), and what he was saying thereof. Another regular feature in the news channels happens to be what the latest tweets are on specific topics or current events… suddenly you see that Twitter is also about content…

The idea of Twitter was to provide a simple platform for the online users to update their status; and for their friends and followers to see and respond. The idea of keeping it under 140 characters was to make the integration with existing SMS platforms easier…. The idea has been very successful, and people have started taking on to Twitter a big way… The stats say that almost 40-45% of Twitter traffic is from Mobile platforms and the remaining from the web. The whole idea of Twitter was on ease of connecting and getting connected…. I’m sure using Twitter for content creation would have been last thing in the minds of the creators of Twitter.

The media (new or traditional) survives on content. The fresher and exclusive the content the better it is. Traditionally, media companies’ generated content mostly from internal sources (Editors, journalists, reporters etc); External (Freelancers, writers,) and Syndicated content (AP, Reuters, Bloomberg, PTI, etc)… and there was a cost attached to these sources of content. With the advent of the web and specifically the web 2.0, a free source of content was discovered – User Generated Content. And when the user is a celebrity, with some media sell-able value attached…the content becomes golden; Imagine if a newspaper or TV carries free content sourced from tweets, they could easily fill up columns or minutes of prime-time news…which otherwise they would need to have filled with paid content….

The way things are shaping up – Twitter would soon become a content generator for media companies and might even be supplying most of the content… Maybe, just maybe – some sort of content syndication (or content generator) could the elusive business model that Twitter can look forward to make money ;)

It is a marriage of convenience. Content starved media feeds of the tweets; and in return Twitter gets free publicity…which would translate into more people joining the twitter platform, and more tweets being generated…thus more content being published for the media to consume…

This looks like a story that will ‘live happily ever after’ :)

Twitter: Connection Generator or Content Generator

I’m sure the following scenarios would be familiar to most people… If you look carefully at what is being said or written in the Media (Television / Newspapers)… news on “My Name is Khan” – the movie, about Shah Rukh Khan’s comments and many other related titbits. Few months back it was Sashi Tharoor and about what he said (the cattle class comments), and what he was saying thereof. Another regular feature in the news channels happens to be what the latest tweets are on specific topics or current events… suddenly you see that Twitter is also about content…

The idea of Twitter was to provide a simple platform for the online users to update their status; and for their friends and followers to see and respond. The idea of keeping it under 140 characters was to make the integration with existing SMS platforms easier…. The idea has been very successful, and people have started taking on to Twitter a big way… The stats say that almost 40-45% of Twitter traffic is from Mobile platforms and the remaining from the web. The whole idea of Twitter was on ease of connecting and getting connected…. I’m sure using Twitter for content creation would have been last thing in the minds of the creators of Twitter.

The media (new or traditional) survives on content. The fresher and exclusive the content the better it is. Traditionally, media companies’ generated content mostly from internal sources (Editors, journalists, reporters etc); External (Freelancers, writers,) and Syndicated content (AP, Reuters, Bloomberg, PTI, etc)… and there was a cost attached to these sources of content. With the advent of the web and specifically the web 2.0, a free source of content was discovered – User Generated Content. And when the user is a celebrity, with some media sell-able value attached…the content becomes golden; Imagine if a newspaper or TV carries free content sourced from tweets, they could easily fill up columns or minutes of prime-time news…which otherwise they would need to have filled with paid content….

The way things are shaping up – Twitter would soon become a content generator for media companies and might even be supplying most of the content… Maybe, just maybe – some sort of content syndication (or content generator) could the elusive business model that Twitter can look forward to make money ;)

It is a marriage of convenience. Content starved media feeds of the tweets; and in return Twitter gets free publicity…which would translate into more people joining the twitter platform, and more tweets being generated…thus more content being published for the media to consume…

This looks like a story that will ‘live happily ever after’ :)

Rabu, 17 Februari 2010

Yup, She Is A Beader...

As I was getting dinner ready, Chloe was playing with some beads (putting them in the bottle, dumped into bin, back in the bottle - hours of entertainment)...

Peeves, the cat, was quite interested in the goings on too...


And I was able to snap this shot.

I don't know if it has been us all cooped up in the house over the last couple of weeks because of the snow, but these two have really bonded...

- Posted using BlogPress from my iPhone

Yup, She Is A Beader...

As I was getting dinner ready, Chloe was playing with some beads (putting them in the bottle, dumped into bin, back in the bottle - hours of entertainment)...

Peeves, the cat, was quite interested in the goings on too...


And I was able to snap this shot.

I don't know if it has been us all cooped up in the house over the last couple of weeks because of the snow, but these two have really bonded...

- Posted using BlogPress from my iPhone

Selasa, 09 Februari 2010

Dark Eyed Junco, Bird of Inspiration...

For those of you wondering what a Dark Eyed Junco looks like...

Here is a picture I took yesterday of a male in our back yard:

They are here in this part of Northern Delaware (mid-atlantic US region) only over the colder months...

The males have dark slate gray/black feathers on top...
The females have dark brown feathers on top...

Good thing we filled up the feeders and have some extra seed to throw out to them from the sliding door. We already have 24"+ of snow on the ground from this last weekend, and are expecting up to another 24" overnight tonight into tomorrow around midnight...

Hello Snowy Winter - where have you been since 1993?

Dark Eyed Junco, Bird of Inspiration...

For those of you wondering what a Dark Eyed Junco looks like...

Here is a picture I took yesterday of a male in our back yard:

They are here in this part of Northern Delaware (mid-atlantic US region) only over the colder months...

The males have dark slate gray/black feathers on top...
The females have dark brown feathers on top...

Good thing we filled up the feeders and have some extra seed to throw out to them from the sliding door. We already have 24"+ of snow on the ground from this last weekend, and are expecting up to another 24" overnight tonight into tomorrow around midnight...

Hello Snowy Winter - where have you been since 1993?

Senin, 01 Februari 2010

Back to tribalism: Future lies in the past

No one will argue the fact that we all live in a networked world. You connected to me, connected to another, and another, and to the whole world. True? Well, not quite. Take a detailed look into this networked world; you will find that it is a chain of islands, with spaces between each other…. It is islands of online communities, groups, niche networks, etc…

You realize that this online world (especially the social networking) is not one big homogeneous society, but a collection of different types of groups. But looking at our past we know that human advancement has been on basis of creating a homogeneous society… From being a small group of hunters and gatherers, to forming large communities, building villages, city states, empires, and to nation states of today… Now that we have the technology and the medium to create this homogeneous society, even if it is online, why do we shy from doing so?

If we look back at the start of the Internet – it was a repository of information that can be accessed from multiple locations. Information that can be de-centralized, shared, and saved so that it can be accessed by people despite not being physically present in the location. Soon with the advent of technology and the coming of emails, Instant Messaging, Chat rooms, real time publishing and sharing of information all added to internet becoming a medium of communication. The growing successes of today’s social media sites are proof that people now prefer Internet as a medium of communication rather than a repository of information.

While the modern science has the tremendous power of accelerating of the mental evolution process of human mind, human beings prefer to have an uncomplicated life. They still are more concerned about their immediate universe than the world at large. While peace and security could be the key drivers for people aspire for homogeneous society, the fear of unknown is much more powerful.

An inherent human predisposition is to relate and identify with ‘your own’. As Humans are ill equipped to live on their own, they commit themselves to a group. Close interactions within a group gives rise to strong cultural and ethnic identity. And to recognize and create a sense of identity one takes the help of symbols and signs. In olden days this was usually done either through the way one dressed, and overt symbols like beads, threads, head gears, etc that one identified the group. As the society became more homogeneous, these were discarded. But till few decades back the growth of society was limited by geography. This limitation is now erased with technology and the all pervasive online world it has created.

Social Media while allowing the ease of connectivity has also increased the chances for fear of unknown to enter your life more easily. This leads to building protective firewalls, and a stronger reason to relate and identify with ‘your own’ in the online space. Hence we fall back on creating identification symbols.
In future, as each social media platforms seamlessly integrate with each other (this trend has already begun, with cross platform integration – Orkut – Twitter – Facebook, etc) humans will tend to closely guard themselves by forming groups… And since the communication is real-time, they will form a strong bonding and will create unique identity for themselves… and similar to the tribalism of the past, the bonding will make it hard for people to either leave a group or to join a group

In today’s online space most of the groups are formed basis common interest, hobbies, religion, alumni, or even a cause. While some of the superficial reasons will not be popular in the future…some like religion (or ideology), sex, and family would be prime motivators for creating groups online

While we talk about a homogeneous society for progression of Humanity…We still mostly live by instincts. Humans are after all social ‘animals’ :)

Cheers

Back to tribalism: Future lies in the past

No one will argue the fact that we all live in a networked world. You connected to me, connected to another, and another, and to the whole world. True? Well, not quite. Take a detailed look into this networked world; you will find that it is a chain of islands, with spaces between each other…. It is islands of online communities, groups, niche networks, etc…

You realize that this online world (especially the social networking) is not one big homogeneous society, but a collection of different types of groups. But looking at our past we know that human advancement has been on basis of creating a homogeneous society… From being a small group of hunters and gatherers, to forming large communities, building villages, city states, empires, and to nation states of today… Now that we have the technology and the medium to create this homogeneous society, even if it is online, why do we shy from doing so?

If we look back at the start of the Internet – it was a repository of information that can be accessed from multiple locations. Information that can be de-centralized, shared, and saved so that it can be accessed by people despite not being physically present in the location. Soon with the advent of technology and the coming of emails, Instant Messaging, Chat rooms, real time publishing and sharing of information all added to internet becoming a medium of communication. The growing successes of today’s social media sites are proof that people now prefer Internet as a medium of communication rather than a repository of information.

While the modern science has the tremendous power of accelerating of the mental evolution process of human mind, human beings prefer to have an uncomplicated life. They still are more concerned about their immediate universe than the world at large. While peace and security could be the key drivers for people aspire for homogeneous society, the fear of unknown is much more powerful.

An inherent human predisposition is to relate and identify with ‘your own’. As Humans are ill equipped to live on their own, they commit themselves to a group. Close interactions within a group gives rise to strong cultural and ethnic identity. And to recognize and create a sense of identity one takes the help of symbols and signs. In olden days this was usually done either through the way one dressed, and overt symbols like beads, threads, head gears, etc that one identified the group. As the society became more homogeneous, these were discarded. But till few decades back the growth of society was limited by geography. This limitation is now erased with technology and the all pervasive online world it has created.

Social Media while allowing the ease of connectivity has also increased the chances for fear of unknown to enter your life more easily. This leads to building protective firewalls, and a stronger reason to relate and identify with ‘your own’ in the online space. Hence we fall back on creating identification symbols.
In future, as each social media platforms seamlessly integrate with each other (this trend has already begun, with cross platform integration – Orkut – Twitter – Facebook, etc) humans will tend to closely guard themselves by forming groups… And since the communication is real-time, they will form a strong bonding and will create unique identity for themselves… and similar to the tribalism of the past, the bonding will make it hard for people to either leave a group or to join a group

In today’s online space most of the groups are formed basis common interest, hobbies, religion, alumni, or even a cause. While some of the superficial reasons will not be popular in the future…some like religion (or ideology), sex, and family would be prime motivators for creating groups online

While we talk about a homogeneous society for progression of Humanity…We still mostly live by instincts. Humans are after all social ‘animals’ :)

Cheers

Back to tribalism: Future lies in the past

No one will argue the fact that we all live in a networked world. You connected to me, connected to another, and another, and to the whole world. True? Well, not quite. Take a detailed look into this networked world; you will find that it is a chain of islands, with spaces between each other…. It is islands of online communities, groups, niche networks, etc…

You realize that this online world (especially the social networking) is not one big homogeneous society, but a collection of different types of groups. But looking at our past we know that human advancement has been on basis of creating a homogeneous society… From being a small group of hunters and gatherers, to forming large communities, building villages, city states, empires, and to nation states of today… Now that we have the technology and the medium to create this homogeneous society, even if it is online, why do we shy from doing so?

If we look back at the start of the Internet – it was a repository of information that can be accessed from multiple locations. Information that can be de-centralized, shared, and saved so that it can be accessed by people despite not being physically present in the location. Soon with the advent of technology and the coming of emails, Instant Messaging, Chat rooms, real time publishing and sharing of information all added to internet becoming a medium of communication. The growing successes of today’s social media sites are proof that people now prefer Internet as a medium of communication rather than a repository of information.

While the modern science has the tremendous power of accelerating of the mental evolution process of human mind, human beings prefer to have an uncomplicated life. They still are more concerned about their immediate universe than the world at large. While peace and security could be the key drivers for people aspire for homogeneous society, the fear of unknown is much more powerful.

An inherent human predisposition is to relate and identify with ‘your own’. As Humans are ill equipped to live on their own, they commit themselves to a group. Close interactions within a group gives rise to strong cultural and ethnic identity. And to recognize and create a sense of identity one takes the help of symbols and signs. In olden days this was usually done either through the way one dressed, and overt symbols like beads, threads, head gears, etc that one identified the group. As the society became more homogeneous, these were discarded. But till few decades back the growth of society was limited by geography. This limitation is now erased with technology and the all pervasive online world it has created.

Social Media while allowing the ease of connectivity has also increased the chances for fear of unknown to enter your life more easily. This leads to building protective firewalls, and a stronger reason to relate and identify with ‘your own’ in the online space. Hence we fall back on creating identification symbols.
In future, as each social media platforms seamlessly integrate with each other (this trend has already begun, with cross platform integration – Orkut – Twitter – Facebook, etc) humans will tend to closely guard themselves by forming groups… And since the communication is real-time, they will form a strong bonding and will create unique identity for themselves… and similar to the tribalism of the past, the bonding will make it hard for people to either leave a group or to join a group

In today’s online space most of the groups are formed basis common interest, hobbies, religion, alumni, or even a cause. While some of the superficial reasons will not be popular in the future…some like religion (or ideology), sex, and family would be prime motivators for creating groups online

While we talk about a homogeneous society for progression of Humanity…We still mostly live by instincts. Humans are after all social ‘animals’ :)

Cheers